[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Pricing depends on site size, access, deliverables, processing needs, and whether the project requires additional survey control or combined methods. A project review is the best way to get a meaningful quote because two sites with the same acreage can still require very different workflows. Sharing the intended use of the data helps the team price the work more accurately.
The most common mistake is ordering imagery when the project actually needs survey-ready mapping, elevation data, or a surface model. Another issue is not defining the final deliverables up front, which can lead to files that do not fit CAD, GIS, or BIM workflows. A short scope review helps prevent those problems before field work begins.
Timing depends on project scope, site access, weather, airspace, and the requested deliverables. Aerial Metrology & Inspection reviews those factors during regular business hours and then advises on the next practical step. That approach is more reliable than promising a fixed turnaround before the site is reviewed.
Often yes, but only if the deliverables are scoped for that purpose. Orthomosaics, point clouds, terrain models, contours, and CAD or GIS compatible files can support planning and coordination when they are collected and processed to match the project needs. The intended use should be stated at the start so the output fits the workflow.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
