[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
UAS surveying is often faster for capturing broad site conditions, while a traditional field survey is better suited to tasks that require ground-level detail, control, or boundary work. The right choice depends on the project objective, the deliverables needed, and the site conditions. In many cases, the best result comes from combining methods rather than treating them as interchangeable.
Pricing depends on site size, access, processing needs, and the final deliverables. A simple mapping assignment will usually cost less than a project that needs control, detailed modeling, or multiple outputs. The most reliable way to estimate cost is to review the site, timeline, and intended use before quoting the work.
The timeline depends on scope, weather, airspace, site access, and the level of processing required. Some projects move quickly once the scope is clear, while others need more coordination before collection can begin. AMI reviews those factors up front so the schedule is based on the actual job rather than a generic promise.
The data is processed, checked, and prepared into the agreed deliverables. That may include maps, point clouds, orthomosaics, surface models, or CAD and GIS-compatible files depending on the project. If the receiving team needs clarification, AMI can help explain the output so it is easier to use after delivery.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
