[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
It fits best when the project needs current site data, surface detail, or documentation that can support planning and verification. The method is reviewed against access, airspace, weather, and the deliverables you need, so the workflow is matched to the site instead of forced into a standard package.
Timing depends on scope, site access, weather, and processing needs. Some projects can move quickly once the scope is clear, while others require more coordination or additional survey control. The most reliable way to estimate timing is to review the site and deliverables first.
Common deliverables include orthomosaics, point clouds, surface models, contours, and CAD or GIS compatible files. The exact output depends on the project purpose and the level of processing needed. If your team needs a specific format, it should be discussed at the start so the workflow supports it.
Cost depends on site size, access, control requirements, processing effort, and the final deliverables. AMI reviews the project scope before pricing so the estimate reflects the actual work instead of a generic rate. That gives you a more useful basis for planning and comparison.
After delivery, AMI can help clarify the output, answer scope questions, and confirm whether additional survey work may be needed for the next phase. The team does not provide legal, title, engineering, or regulatory advice, but it can help you understand how the dataset is intended to be used.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
