Get Your Quote

UAS surveying is often faster for capturing broad site conditions, while a traditional ground survey is better for certain boundary, control, or detail tasks. The right choice depends on the project purpose, required deliverables, and site conditions. In many cases, the strongest result comes from combining methods instead of relying on only one.

The most common mistake is ordering aerial data without defining the final use. If the deliverable, accuracy needs, or file format are unclear, the dataset may not fit the design or documentation workflow. Another mistake is assuming every site can be collected the same way, because access, airspace, weather, and control needs can change the plan.

Cost depends on site size, complexity, deliverables, processing time, and whether additional survey control or coordination is needed. A simple mapping assignment is priced differently than a dataset intended for technical design or verification. The best way to get a useful number is to share the project scope and required output.

Scheduling depends on project scope, location, access, weather, airspace, and the requested deliverables. AMI provides prompt response during regular business hours and reviews the scope before confirming the plan. Some projects move quickly, while others need more coordination to collect the right data safely and responsibly.

Have the site location, project purpose, timeline, access notes, and desired deliverables ready if possible. It also helps to mention whether the data needs to work in CAD, GIS, or another technical workflow. The more clearly the goal is defined, the easier it is to recommend the right collection approach.

Yes, project information is handled with professional care and discretion. That is especially important for property transactions, legal matters, and active construction sites where access and documentation details should stay controlled. If privacy is a concern, mention it during the initial scope discussion so expectations are clear.