[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Send the site location, access notes, timeline, and the deliverables you need. That information helps determine whether aerial mapping alone is enough or whether the project would benefit from control, scanning, or another survey method. A clear scope also makes the quote more useful and reduces back-and-forth later.
Timing depends on site conditions, airspace, weather, access, and the requested deliverables. AMI reviews project requests promptly during regular business hours, but field scheduling is based on what the site allows and what the workflow requires. A simple site may move faster than a complex one with control or multiple outputs.
Yes, depending on the project scope and processing requirements. Deliverables may include orthomosaics, point clouds, terrain models, surface models, maps, and structured files that can support CAD, GIS, or BIM workflows. The right format should be discussed before collection so the output matches the next step.
No universal warranty can be promised for every site or every use case. Results depend on the collection method, site conditions, control, processing workflow, and the project requirements. The practical safeguard is a clear scope review so the work is planned around the actual deliverables and limitations.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
