[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
The timeline depends on site size, tree density, access, weather, and the deliverables requested. Smaller, straightforward sites can move faster than larger or more complex assignments, especially if the tree survey needs to be coordinated with other site data. A scope review is the best way to get a realistic schedule.
Cost depends on the property, the number of trees, the level of detail required, and whether the work is combined with boundary, topographic, or other survey services. A simple site is usually less involved than a multi-phase development parcel. AMI reviews the scope first so the quote reflects the actual assignment.
A site address, parcel information, concept plan, survey base map, or list of deliverables is usually enough to start. If you have access notes, timeline constraints, or a preferred file format, include those as well. The more clearly the scope is defined, the easier it is to match the work to the project need.
AMI reviews the project scope, location, site conditions, access requirements, timeline, and requested deliverables before confirming the next step. If the assignment is a fit, the team can outline the approach and move toward scheduling. That keeps the process practical and avoids unnecessary back-and-forth.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
