[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
The timeline depends on site size, access, weather, method selection, and the deliverables requested. Smaller, straightforward sites can move faster than complex parcels with dense vegetation, limited access, or multiple output requirements. The best way to estimate timing is to share the site location, scope, and target use so the project can be reviewed before scheduling.
Have the site address, project purpose, approximate limits, desired deliverables, and any deadline ready. If you already have a site plan, prior survey, grading concept, or civil background file, those materials can help define the scope more efficiently. Clear inputs usually lead to a more useful quote and fewer revisions later.
Cost depends on site size, terrain complexity, access, vegetation, required detail, and the final deliverables. A simple open site is usually different from a constrained property that needs more processing or multiple collection methods. AMI reviews the project scope first so pricing reflects the actual work needed.
Yes, coordinated datasets are often possible when the project benefits from more than one collection method. Topographic information can be paired with LiDAR, photogrammetry, point clouds, or CAD-compatible outputs when that combination supports design, verification, or documentation. The right mix depends on the site and the end use of the data.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
