[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Yes, it can be a strong fit for both, depending on the project objective. Terrestrial scanning is often used for buildings, site features, structural details, and other conditions that benefit from dense 3D documentation. The best approach depends on access, line of sight, and the deliverables your team needs.
Send the site location, a short description of the problem you are trying to solve, any plans or sketches, and the file formats you need. That gives the team enough information to evaluate scope, access, and processing effort. Clear project details usually lead to a more useful quote.
The field data is processed and organized into the deliverables agreed on during scope review. Depending on the project, that may include point clouds, sections, profiles, surface models, or CAD and GIS-compatible files. The goal is to hand off information that your project team can actually use.
Yes, and that is often helpful on more complex sites. Terrestrial scanning can be coordinated with other survey or reality-capture methods to build a more complete dataset. Combining methods can improve consistency when a project needs both detailed geometry and broader site context.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
