[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Yes, if your project needs reliable site information before layout, grading, or construction decisions are made. The best fit depends on the lot conditions, access, and the deliverables your builder or designer needs. A quick scope review can confirm whether boundary, topographic, construction verification, or reality capture services are the right match.
Cost depends on the site size, complexity, access, required accuracy, and the final deliverables. A simple lot with straightforward access will usually differ from a site that needs multiple collection methods or more detailed documentation. The most reliable way to get pricing is to request a quote with the project scope and location.
Clear access to the site is the most helpful preparation. It also helps to share any available plans, prior surveys, construction drawings, or notes about site constraints, utilities, or restricted areas. The more complete the scope information, the easier it is to match the collection method to the job.
The timeline depends on project scope, weather, access, and the type of deliverables requested. Field collection may be quick on a simple site, but processing and drafting can take longer when the job requires detailed models, drawings, or coordinated datasets. AMI reviews timing during the scope conversation so expectations stay realistic.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
