Get Your Quote

Pricing depends on site size, access, complexity, required accuracy, collection method, and the deliverables requested. A small, straightforward site will usually cost less than a project that needs multiple data types, difficult access, or coordinated CAD and point cloud outputs. The most reliable way to price it is to review the site and scope first.

The most common mistakes are unclear scope, missing deliverable requirements, and assuming one collection method fits every site. Problems also happen when the survey is ordered too late, after design decisions have already been made. A short scope review up front helps avoid those issues.

The process starts with a review of the site, access, timeline, and required outputs. AMI then recommends the appropriate surveying or reality-capture method and prepares deliverables that fit the project needs. The goal is to provide usable site information that supports design and coordination.

Yes, project deliverables can be prepared for CAD, GIS, and BIM-compatible workflows when that is part of the scope. The exact file types and level of detail should be defined before collection begins so the final package supports the architect’s workflow. That helps reduce conversion issues later.

AMI treats client privacy and project materials with professional care and discretion. Site information, drawings, imagery, and related files are handled as project materials, not public content. If a project has special confidentiality concerns, those should be discussed during the scope review.