[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
You should define the site area, the design purpose, and the deliverables you need. That may include boundary context, topography, visible improvements, tree locations, utility references, point clouds, or CAD-ready files depending on the project. Clear scope helps AMI match the collection method to the design task.
Timing depends on site access, weather, airspace, project size, and the requested deliverables. AMI reviews those factors before confirming the work, so the schedule is based on the actual project rather than a generic promise. That approach is more reliable for design teams working toward a real deadline.
Yes, when the scope is set correctly. AMI can provide deliverables that support coordination across architecture, civil, structural, and landscape teams, including drawings, surface models, point clouds, and other structured files as needed. The key is confirming the file format and level of detail up front.
You can follow up after delivery to discuss the scope, file structure, or how the data was organized. That aftercare helps the handoff stay usable for design coordination and reduces confusion when the dataset is shared with consultants. It is best to raise those questions early so the final package fits the project workflow.
Cost depends on site size, complexity, access, collection method, and the deliverables requested. A simple base survey and a coordinated reality-capture package do not require the same effort, so pricing is project-specific. The most useful next step is to request a quote with the site location and scope details.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
