[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
It starts with the site objective, not the equipment. AMI reviews the area to be captured, the deliverables needed, access limits, and any control or accuracy requirements, then selects the collection method that fits the job. The result is a dataset built for a real use case such as design support, verification, or documentation.
Timing depends on scope, site access, weather, airspace, and the deliverables requested. AMI provides prompt response during regular business hours and reviews the project details before confirming scheduling. That approach helps set a realistic timeline instead of guessing at availability.
Before fieldwork, you should expect a scope review and a discussion of access, target areas, and file needs. During collection, the site is documented using the methods best suited to the project. Afterward, the data is processed into usable deliverables such as point clouds, models, maps, or CAD and GIS compatible files.
Pricing depends on the size of the site, the complexity of access, the collection method, and the final deliverables. A simple verification area will usually cost less than a multi-method capture package with processing and multiple file outputs. The most useful quote comes after AMI reviews the project scope and requested results.
Yes. Deliverables can be prepared in formats that support design, coordination, and review workflows, including point clouds, orthomosaics, surface models, profiles, cross sections, and CAD or GIS compatible files. The exact output depends on the project objective and the method used to collect the data.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
