[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Cost depends on site size, access, terrain, required detail, and the final deliverables. A smaller, straightforward assignment will usually cost less than a project that needs more field time, control, or coordinated outputs for design use.
The work starts with a scope review to understand access limits, safety concerns, and the information the project team needs. From there, AMI selects the collection method that best fits the site and the deliverables, which may include conventional survey methods, LiDAR, photogrammetry, or a coordinated approach.
Timing depends on project scope, weather, site access, airspace, and the requested deliverables. AMI reviews those factors before scheduling so the timeline is based on the actual job rather than a generic estimate.
Yes. Deliverables can be organized for practical use in CAD, GIS, or related project workflows when that is part of the agreed scope. The exact format should be discussed up front so the final package matches the needs of the receiving team.
Support is tied to the agreed project scope and deliverables. If clarification is needed after delivery, AMI can discuss the file structure, scope, and intended use so the information is easier for your team to apply correctly.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
