[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Ask for the deliverables that match how the data will be used. That may include profile sheets, cross sections, CAD files, GIS-ready data, point clouds, or a surface model. The right format depends on whether the project is for design, verification, drainage review, or coordination with another consultant.
Pricing depends on the length of the profile, site access, control needs, deliverable format, and whether additional methods are required. A short scope review is the best way to get a realistic quote because two projects with similar lengths can still require very different field and processing effort.
The most common mistakes are unclear limits, missing vertical reference requirements, and asking for a deliverable that does not match the downstream use. Another frequent issue is assuming a profile line alone will answer a broader site question when cross sections or supporting topography are also needed.
Scheduling depends on project scope, location, site access, weather, airspace, and the requested deliverables. AMI reviews those factors before confirming availability, so the fastest path is to send the site details and let the team evaluate the job requirements.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
