Get Your Quote

Pricing depends on site size, access, processing effort, and the deliverables you need. A small visual mapping job is typically different from a coordinated dataset for design, quantity work, or construction verification. The most useful quote comes from a review of the site, timeline, and final file requirements.

The process starts with scope review, then imagery collection, then processing into usable deliverables. Depending on the project, that may include orthomosaics, point clouds, surface models, or CAD and GIS compatible files. The right workflow depends on the site conditions and what the data must support.

Timing depends on project scope, location, access, weather, airspace, and the deliverables requested. Some projects move quickly once the scope is clear, while others need more coordination or processing time. AMI reviews those factors before confirming a schedule.

Before the work starts, AMI reviews the site, access, timeline, and deliverables. During collection, the team captures the imagery needed for the project and any supporting control or verification work. After processing, you receive the agreed deliverables in a format that can be reviewed or used by your project team.

AMI combines Florida-licensed surveying oversight with photogrammetry and related geospatial methods, which helps match the workflow to the actual project need. That matters when the deliverable has to support planning, documentation, or coordination rather than just visual presentation. The team also reviews scope carefully before work begins.

Yes, photogrammetry can be combined with GNSS control, terrestrial scanning, LiDAR, or field verification when the project calls for it. That can improve the usefulness of the final dataset for design, mapping, or comparison work. The best mix depends on the site and the required deliverables.