[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Photogrammetry is often the best choice when you need a visual, measurable model built from overlapping imagery, while LiDAR or terrestrial scanning may be better for certain geometry, vegetation, or detail conditions. The right method depends on the site, the required deliverables, and how the data will be used. AMI can help compare options before work begins so the collection method matches the project need.
Cost depends on site size, access, control requirements, processing time, and the final deliverables. A simple mapping job is usually different from a larger project that needs orthomosaics, point clouds, or CAD-ready outputs. The most reliable way to price the work is to share the site location, scope, and intended use of the data.
Have the site address, a brief description of the problem, and any drawings or maps that show the area of interest. It also helps to note access constraints, safety concerns, and whether the deliverables need to fit CAD, GIS, or BIM workflows. That information helps AMI plan the collection and avoid unnecessary delays.
Turnaround depends on project size, weather, access, and the amount of processing required. Smaller assignments may move quickly, while larger or more detailed projects take longer because the data must be reviewed and processed carefully. AMI reviews each scope before scheduling so expectations stay realistic.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
