[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Photogrammetry is often the better fit when you need high-resolution imagery, orthomosaics, and surface detail from overlapping photos. LiDAR is usually stronger for penetrating vegetation and capturing certain terrain conditions. The right choice depends on the site, the deliverables, and how the data will be used.
The timeline depends on site access, weather, airspace, project size, and the requested outputs. Some projects move quickly once the scope is clear, while others need more planning and processing time. The most reliable way to estimate timing is to share the site, schedule, and deliverables up front.
Cost depends on the area to be captured, the complexity of the site, the level of processing required, and the final deliverables. A simple mapping assignment will usually differ from a project that needs control, CAD-ready files, or multiple output formats. A scoped quote is the best way to get a realistic number.
Sometimes, yes, but availability depends on project scope, location, site access, travel requirements, weather, airspace, and requested deliverables. AMI reviews those factors during regular business hours before confirming a schedule. Sharing your target date early gives the team a better chance to plan around it.
Send the site location, the reason you need the data, any deadline you are working toward, and the deliverables you want. If you already know whether you need an orthomosaic, point cloud, surface model, or CAD-compatible output, include that too. Clear project details make the quote process faster and more useful.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
