[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Pricing depends on site size, access, deliverables, processing needs, and whether the project needs survey control or related methods. A small documentation job and a larger mapping package are priced differently because the fieldwork and processing effort are not the same. The most useful quote comes from sharing the location, scope, timeline, and final file requirements.
The timeline depends on site conditions, weather, airspace, access, and the requested outputs. Collection can be quick on a straightforward site, but processing and quality review still take time. AMI reviews the project scope first so the schedule reflects the actual work rather than a generic promise.
The most common mistakes are vague scope, missing access details, and choosing deliverables that do not match the intended use. Problems also happen when a team assumes imagery alone will replace a measured dataset. A clear kickoff conversation helps avoid those issues and keeps the final files useful.
Yes, many projects are delivered in formats that support CAD, GIS, and 3D review workflows. The exact output depends on what the downstream team needs and how the site was collected. It is best to specify the required format before work begins so the processing plan matches the end use.
Send the site location, a short description of the problem you are trying to solve, the timeline, and the deliverables you need. Photos, sketches, prior surveys, or plan sheets can also help the team understand the scope. The more specific the request, the easier it is to prepare a practical estimate.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
