[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
Multibeam sonar collects a wider swath of bottom data in each pass, while single-beam sonar captures depth along a narrower line. The better choice depends on the site, the level of detail needed, and the deliverables your team expects. For some projects, a combined workflow is the most practical option.
Cost depends on site size, access, water conditions, travel, and the final deliverables. A small bathymetric mapping task will not price the same as a larger surface model or cross-section package. The most reliable way to get a number is to share the scope, location, and output requirements.
Before the survey, the scope, access, and deliverables should be reviewed so the work plan matches the site. During collection, the team gathers depth and position data under the project conditions. Afterward, the data is processed into the agreed outputs, such as maps, profiles, surfaces, or structured files.
That can often be discussed before processing is finalized. If the field data supports the new output, the deliverable package may be adjusted to better fit the project. The key is to raise the change as early as possible so the workflow stays efficient and the final dataset remains useful.
The service is appropriate when the site conditions, access, and project goals can be reviewed clearly before collection. Safety depends on water conditions, weather, site access, and any applicable restrictions, so each job is evaluated individually. A brief scope discussion is the best way to confirm fit.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
