[nsg_ai_p1]
[nsg_ai_p2]
[nsg_ai_p3]
[nsg_ai_p4]
LiDAR scanning is usually better for capturing elevation and surface detail through vegetation or complex terrain, while photogrammetry is often stronger for visual context and textured imagery. Many projects benefit from a combined workflow when the team needs both geometric data and visual documentation. The right choice depends on the site, the deliverables, and how the data will be used.
The timeline depends on site size, access, weather, airspace, and the level of processing required. Smaller or simpler sites may move faster than large or highly detailed projects, but every job starts with a scope review before timing is discussed. AMI reviews the project needs first so the schedule matches the actual deliverables.
The most common mistakes are unclear scope, weak control planning, and asking for deliverables after the collection plan is already set. Another issue is assuming every site can be handled the same way, even when access, vegetation, or airspace changes the workflow. A good pre-project review helps avoid those problems.
Cost depends on the site conditions, project size, access, required accuracy, and the final deliverables. A simple surface capture is not priced the same as a coordinated dataset with control, processing, and CAD or GIS outputs. The most reliable way to estimate cost is to share the scope, location, and intended use of the data.
Have a project that needs reliable surveying, LiDAR, or reality capture deliverables? Contact Aerial Metrology & Inspection to discuss your scope, timeline, and project requirements.
